B
Big McLargehuge
This may seem like a stupid question, but please humor me.
I currently have a rig with a P4 2.8Ghz cpu.
I'm thinking of getting a new machine and relegating my current one to
secondary duties and am looking at AMD instead of Intel.
I got my Intel cpu about 2 years ago, and the newer AMD CPUs i'm
looking at run around the same clock speed. I've heard that AMD runs
better than Intel at similar clock speeds, and I want to get a
relatively high end CPU since I'm a big gamer.
is an $800 AMD cpu that clocks in at 2.8 Ghz actually that much faster
than my old P4 2.8? It seems like a lot of money for the same speed,
although I realize that there other differences than just clock speed.
Can anyone explain to me what all the differences are that support the
claims (and price) of the AMD promoters? This is not a loaded
question, I'm seriously considering buying AND (a dual core, actually)
and want to make an informed decision.
Thanks.
Big
I currently have a rig with a P4 2.8Ghz cpu.
I'm thinking of getting a new machine and relegating my current one to
secondary duties and am looking at AMD instead of Intel.
I got my Intel cpu about 2 years ago, and the newer AMD CPUs i'm
looking at run around the same clock speed. I've heard that AMD runs
better than Intel at similar clock speeds, and I want to get a
relatively high end CPU since I'm a big gamer.
is an $800 AMD cpu that clocks in at 2.8 Ghz actually that much faster
than my old P4 2.8? It seems like a lot of money for the same speed,
although I realize that there other differences than just clock speed.
Can anyone explain to me what all the differences are that support the
claims (and price) of the AMD promoters? This is not a loaded
question, I'm seriously considering buying AND (a dual core, actually)
and want to make an informed decision.
Thanks.
Big