Ed Medlin said:
Strange one. Basically it seems that they are going after AMD's ATI
graphics division and NVidia. Might be a fishing trip
MIGHT?!? It would have to be a fishing trip, if both are being
investigated.
It might not have much effect anyway. The days of the separate video card
are numbered. Pretty soon, the CPU will be just a small "core" on the GPU,
if the CPU exists at all. Properly tweaked, a modern GPU could handle all
CPU tasks (in addition to GPU tasks) without even noticeably slowing down.
The spot on mainboards that hold CPUs will hold just a GPU (that will also
handle CPU tasks). The chip manufacturers might still call it a "CPU"
though, even though it will be mostly a GPU. I suspect this is why AMD
bought ATI. No need to start from scratch to design a GPU, just buy ATI and
then use AMD CPU technology to upgrade the ATI GPU designs, to end up with a
dual-function chip. Why not? You've already got chipsets made by ATI (and
nvidia), so there is no reason that your GPU can't handle CPU functions. Up
next? How about Intel buying nvidia? Then things get real interesting.
We'll be upgrading our CPU and graphics at the same time, just by swapping
one chip. Just depends on whether you like the ATI CPU (not a typo) or the
Nvidia CPU (not a typo) better.
-Dave