Joe McGuire said:
Now that you point it out I can see the subfolders. I had no idea.
Dividing the list of programs into two based on whether or not there are
subfolders seems pretty arbitrary and weird. I'm sure this made sense to
a guy in Redmond when they were inventing Win XP but I doubt I'll remember
whether the program I am looking for has subfolders. Not exactly what I'd
focus on. At least I only have to examine two alphabetized lists.
I believe it's not whether there are subfolders within the folder or not,
but whether the item itself is a file (a shortcut) or a folder, containing
(shortcut) files and/or subfolders. Folders first, then shortcuts.
Thus for me, although "SpywareBlaster" comes after "Outlook Express"
alphabetically, it comes before it in my sorted list because it is a folder
containing shortcuts, as opposed to Outlook Express being a shortcut in its
own right.
And remember, you're not enslaved to how it's ordered; as Ken says, "the
entire structure there is up to you". You can create and move around your
own shortcuts, folders, subfolders, sub-subfolders etc. If you're having
trouble hunting down things quickly, it sounds like that would be a good
idea for you. I like to create top-level entries called Internet,
Multimedia, Security, Games, etc. and group things therein.
The only caveat is that any items you move may well remain in their new
place after you've uninstalled the application. The uninstaller will look in
the place it created the item/s to remove it/them, but won't hunt through a
customised structure. Small price to pay, IMHO.