B
Bill Mitchell
I am sure this has been asked before but I could not find in previous
threads.
My vb.net PPC application is showing every form in the control stack in the
Pocket PC's "Running Programs" list.
My Dell Axim has a custom utility called Switcher Bar which also shows
running apps and allows a user to close a selected app or all running apps
in addition to simply switching between running apps.
The problem I foresee is that my users can effectively get around certain
restrictions I have tried to put in my application such as not allowing a
form to be closed when in an "edit" mode. The program itself behaves
correctly in this event but the user can use this Switcher Bar to select the
form that was displayed before the "edit form".
I did find one post that talked about this problem and using custom controls
(reclassifying a form after it has been visually designed) but this post
looked old as it mentioned the version 1 beta of CF and it also appears to
be quite a bit of extra work to fix this apparent bug (according to the
post).
Does anyone know of an effective workaround or if I am simply not doing
something that I should be?
Thanks in advance,
Bill
threads.
My vb.net PPC application is showing every form in the control stack in the
Pocket PC's "Running Programs" list.
My Dell Axim has a custom utility called Switcher Bar which also shows
running apps and allows a user to close a selected app or all running apps
in addition to simply switching between running apps.
The problem I foresee is that my users can effectively get around certain
restrictions I have tried to put in my application such as not allowing a
form to be closed when in an "edit" mode. The program itself behaves
correctly in this event but the user can use this Switcher Bar to select the
form that was displayed before the "edit form".
I did find one post that talked about this problem and using custom controls
(reclassifying a form after it has been visually designed) but this post
looked old as it mentioned the version 1 beta of CF and it also appears to
be quite a bit of extra work to fix this apparent bug (according to the
post).
Does anyone know of an effective workaround or if I am simply not doing
something that I should be?
Thanks in advance,
Bill