R
Rob Wilkens
Am I the only person finding myself in the following situation:
2 primary desktops and a laptop,
1 of the desktops dual boots between vista RTM and XP, but I continually
boot into XP only on that machine.
1 of the desktops was 'upgraded' to vista RTM bringing over all documents
and settings: I never even turn that nachine on anymore, To me, Vista
Ruined that machine. Actually, the one thing I occasionally use it for is
when I want to watch TV in my computer room because that has a TV Tuner &
Media Center, otherwise it's never touched. It's a $2,000+ 19" tv.
Laptop: I'm scared as all hell to upgrade my working laptop to Vista, if it
goes anything like my desktop machines went.
No, I can't put my finger on any one vista feature which makes me so averse
to it. It's just a combination of things, and especially the fact that a
lot of things just don't work with Vista (x64 anyway). In many ways, Vista
seems significantly slower than XP, and pardon my french but an operating
system is supposed to be in the background and letting the applications do
their thing as fast as the machine can.
If I wanted something that was pretty and slow, I would've bought a
Macintosh years ago.
2 primary desktops and a laptop,
1 of the desktops dual boots between vista RTM and XP, but I continually
boot into XP only on that machine.
1 of the desktops was 'upgraded' to vista RTM bringing over all documents
and settings: I never even turn that nachine on anymore, To me, Vista
Ruined that machine. Actually, the one thing I occasionally use it for is
when I want to watch TV in my computer room because that has a TV Tuner &
Media Center, otherwise it's never touched. It's a $2,000+ 19" tv.
Laptop: I'm scared as all hell to upgrade my working laptop to Vista, if it
goes anything like my desktop machines went.
No, I can't put my finger on any one vista feature which makes me so averse
to it. It's just a combination of things, and especially the fact that a
lot of things just don't work with Vista (x64 anyway). In many ways, Vista
seems significantly slower than XP, and pardon my french but an operating
system is supposed to be in the background and letting the applications do
their thing as fast as the machine can.
If I wanted something that was pretty and slow, I would've bought a
Macintosh years ago.