R
Randi Cox
I have a database set up for county bridge inspections. I
recently added a few new bridges (records) to the
database, which consists of two tables. The bridge number
is the primary key. I added these after the last record,
and the next time I opened up the tables, they were
automatically sorted into both tables in numerical order
(which is what I want). The strange thing, however, is
that when I run a query to check specific information on
the bridges, all the bridges listed in the result are in
numerical order, but those newly added bridges are at the
end (sorted themselves as a little group). When I run a
query simply combining the two tables, it is in proper
numerical order. It is only when I specify criteria that
it groups the new bridges separately at the bottom. Any
ideas?
Thanks,
Randi K. Cox
recently added a few new bridges (records) to the
database, which consists of two tables. The bridge number
is the primary key. I added these after the last record,
and the next time I opened up the tables, they were
automatically sorted into both tables in numerical order
(which is what I want). The strange thing, however, is
that when I run a query to check specific information on
the bridges, all the bridges listed in the result are in
numerical order, but those newly added bridges are at the
end (sorted themselves as a little group). When I run a
query simply combining the two tables, it is in proper
numerical order. It is only when I specify criteria that
it groups the new bridges separately at the bottom. Any
ideas?
Thanks,
Randi K. Cox