G
Guest
The large University where I work is currently in the midst of a migration
from NT4 to W2K Active Directory. I would like to generally explain how it's
being done and get some opinions about it from those of you who have
experienced AD migrations.....
Right now our NT4 network includes 3 account domains and several resource
domains. There is (and will only be) one AD domain with the trusts set up
exactly as if it were one of the NT4 account domains.
User migration part 1:
Someone with Admin rights (often the assigned user) needs to log on to every
Windows machine, at which time they will run a logon script that changes the
ACLs and group memberships to reference the AD domain. I guess the script
runs some sub-scripts and at least one 3rd party migration tool. I keep
insisting that this will have to be run again just before the NT domains are
decommissioned and SID history is gone.
User migration part 2:
This one is to be done one week later.
The user logs onto a machine on which part 1 has already been done. They
now have a new logon script which "migrates" their NT account to AD. As far
as I can tell, what it really does is disable their NT account and enable
their AD account, which exists beforehand but in a disabled state. I'm
guessing that the user profile is somehow migrated by a 3rd party tool.
Simply changing the ACL on the existing profile wouldn't be enough for the
user to automatically get the existing profile once they log on with their AD
account. Maybe keys are added to HKEY_Local_Machine for each profile, with
ProfileImagePath pointing to the respective existing profiles; I don't know.
If someone were to to run the "migration" script on a machine that hadn't
run the part one script, they would end up with a new profile because the ACL
would not have been changed on the existing profile. Supposedly there is a
safeguard in place for that, where the first script leaves a flag that must
be found before the part two script will run.
Computer migration -
Ooops. I guess this doesn't exist. Those of us who are OU administrators
must prepopulate our OUs with machines accounts and then go to each computer
to add it to the AD domain.
What do you think? Is this a good way of migrating? Is it unconventional?
Is it much different that ones that you've been involved in?
I don't know; I've never been involved in one before. I fooled around with
one in a test lab and it was nothing like this.
Hope to hear some feedback.
Thanks.
from NT4 to W2K Active Directory. I would like to generally explain how it's
being done and get some opinions about it from those of you who have
experienced AD migrations.....
Right now our NT4 network includes 3 account domains and several resource
domains. There is (and will only be) one AD domain with the trusts set up
exactly as if it were one of the NT4 account domains.
User migration part 1:
Someone with Admin rights (often the assigned user) needs to log on to every
Windows machine, at which time they will run a logon script that changes the
ACLs and group memberships to reference the AD domain. I guess the script
runs some sub-scripts and at least one 3rd party migration tool. I keep
insisting that this will have to be run again just before the NT domains are
decommissioned and SID history is gone.
User migration part 2:
This one is to be done one week later.
The user logs onto a machine on which part 1 has already been done. They
now have a new logon script which "migrates" their NT account to AD. As far
as I can tell, what it really does is disable their NT account and enable
their AD account, which exists beforehand but in a disabled state. I'm
guessing that the user profile is somehow migrated by a 3rd party tool.
Simply changing the ACL on the existing profile wouldn't be enough for the
user to automatically get the existing profile once they log on with their AD
account. Maybe keys are added to HKEY_Local_Machine for each profile, with
ProfileImagePath pointing to the respective existing profiles; I don't know.
If someone were to to run the "migration" script on a machine that hadn't
run the part one script, they would end up with a new profile because the ACL
would not have been changed on the existing profile. Supposedly there is a
safeguard in place for that, where the first script leaves a flag that must
be found before the part two script will run.
Computer migration -
Ooops. I guess this doesn't exist. Those of us who are OU administrators
must prepopulate our OUs with machines accounts and then go to each computer
to add it to the AD domain.
What do you think? Is this a good way of migrating? Is it unconventional?
Is it much different that ones that you've been involved in?
I don't know; I've never been involved in one before. I fooled around with
one in a test lab and it was nothing like this.
Hope to hear some feedback.
Thanks.