Although people have gotten DCs to talk to each other through NAT, it is very tedious, an administrative headache, and is NOT a configuration that Microsoft supports or recommends.
Although people have gotten DCs to talk to each other through NAT, it is very tedious, an administrative headache, and is NOT a configuration that Microsoft supports or recommends.
Would it be safe to assume that the person using NAT is also using a
router with NAT to provide the NAT feature?
Linksys makes a VPN router that provides IPSec (20 tunnels) that you can
use to NAT your remote networks and still VPN back to the primary office
and then authenticate through the tunnel.
