It probably is a bad idea but it has been done and it involves other
people's databases.
The Access program I run produces an item number, by way of the autonumber
function, which is then notified to several other people as a master item
number. After that each procesesses the information in their own way. When
results (or sometimes lack of results) are finalised (or exhuasted) the
report comes back under the master number.
I would rather not have to begin again as it were but reintroduce the
number
that was obliterated by the power surge. I know one could issue a number
of
one's own but human error then creeps in, which is why the autonumber
function was picked in the first place.
But maybe you have a better idea or a workaround solution?
Thanks, Roy.
This is a bad idea. There are a number of reasons why auto numbers may
not be contiguous and for that reason it's not advisable to use them for
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]