Abstract class, inheritance and designer

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vlado B.
  • Start date Start date
V

Vlado B.

Hello everyone!

Postoji li naèin da ovo bude ispravno i da se sve vidi u designeru?

Is this peace of code correct and if is, is there a way to see Form2 in
designer?

public abstract class Form1 : System.Windows.Forms.Form
{
....
protected abstract void Do();
....
}

public class Form2 : Form1
{
....
protected override void Do()
{
}
....
}

static void Main()
{
Application.Run(new Form2());
}

This works ok in runtime but if I want to see Form2 in designer I get this
error message:
The designer must create an instance of type 'Form1' but it cannot because
the type is declared as abstract.

TIA,

Vlado
 
* "Vlado B. said:
Is this peace of code correct and if is, is there a way to see Form2 in
designer?

public abstract class Form1 : System.Windows.Forms.Form
{
...
protected abstract void Do();
...
}

public class Form2 : Form1
{
...
protected override void Do()
{
}
...
}

static void Main()
{
Application.Run(new Form2());
}

This works ok in runtime but if I want to see Form2 in designer I get this
error message:
The designer must create an instance of type 'Form1' but it cannot because
the type is declared as abstract.
Click to expand...

The designer will instantiate the base class, so you must not mark it as
'abstract'. That's a "limitation" of the designer.
 
Herfried K. Wagner said:
The designer will instantiate the base class, so you must not mark it as
'abstract'. That's a "limitation" of the designer.
Click to expand...


Thanks Herfried,

Is there some workaround for that limitation?

Also, I've made one more inheritance

public class Form3 : Form2
{
}

and Form3 is normally shown in the designer and that's a little bit strange
to me (still not expert).

AFAIK class's constructor calls constructor of base class, so why designer
works fine in this case?

Vlado
 
* "Vlado B. said:
Is there some workaround for that limitation?
No.

Also, I've made one more inheritance

public class Form3 : Form2
{
}

and Form3 is normally shown in the designer and that's a little bit strange
to me (still not expert).
Click to expand...

You mean:

'Form1' (abstract)
'Form2' (not abstract)
'Form3' (not abstract)

The designer should work for 'Form3' because its base class is not
abstract.
 
Back
Top