about versions for ADO amd .net framework

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tony Johansson
  • Start date Start date
T

Tony Johansson

Hello!

I'm reading in a book and it says ADO.NET 2.0.
Now to my question I just wonder if someone can tell me why they don't say
..NET FRAMEWORK 2.0
because you can't have different versions on ADO and .NET FRAMEWORK because
ADO is integrated into the .NET FRAMEWORK.

//Tony
 
Tony said:
I'm reading in a book and it says ADO.NET 2.0.
Now to my question I just wonder if someone can tell me why they don't say
.NET FRAMEWORK 2.0
because you can't have different versions on ADO and .NET FRAMEWORK because
ADO is integrated into the .NET FRAMEWORK.
Click to expand...

You may still talk about a Ford engine instead of just a Ford
even though Ford implies a Ford engine.

Some new stuff were added to ADO.NET in .NET 2.0 - I can
not see any problem calling it ADO.NET 2.0.

Google has 886000 hits on "ADO.NET 2.0", so it seems that
I am not alone.

Arne
 
Hello!

I'm reading in a book and it says ADO.NET 2.0.
Now to my question I just wonder if someone can tell me why they don't
say .NET FRAMEWORK 2.0
because you can't have different versions on ADO and .NET FRAMEWORK
because ADO is integrated into the .NET FRAMEWORK.
Click to expand...


Which sounds like a easier title to sell:

Professional ADO.NET 2.0

Professional ADO.NET with the .NET Framework 2.0

Imagine having to type the second version throughout your book.

"When using ADO.NET with the .NET Framework 2.0, ..."


--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA

Twitter: @gbworld
Blog: http://gregorybeamer.spaces.live.com

******************************************
| Think outside the box! |
******************************************
 
Back
Top