rstlne said:
I think we will probably see holographic storage develop fairly fast
too..
http://www.almaden.ibm.com/sst/storage/alternative_storage/holograhic.shtml
It looks promising but so far has limited usefulness as it's more geared
towards shfting lots of data at a time.
but you can see that hard drives are still going to develop past what
they are now..
http://www.almaden.ibm.com/sst/storage/alternative_storage/pm.shtml
the "Scanning Probe" section also shows that they get 64Gig/Sq.In. and
that's all they have been able to "Make" .. that will replace CD's
and DVD's if they can develop it to something nice.. anyhow..
Indeed, looks a good few years off yet though.
I would
love to see "Solid State" drives come out, but I dont think we ever
will.. The problem is that companys selling one variant of ram will
need to keep the other variants priced in verry similar ways or
everyone will say "What's up with that" .. so from a marketing point
of view.. I think they'll keep solid state drives from taking over..
I'm not sure what you mean. NRAM looks to be able to run rings around
current ram in terms of access time and density. We're talking 100s of Gb
per chip, with access times a good order of magnitude faster, from what I
understand. This means we're talking capacities as great as magnetic
storage, with access times as fast as the cache on your processor. With
lithographic processes the cost is basically proportional to the area of
silicon you use, so it should be cheap (to make, anyway!). We'll have to
wait and see what sort of prices it will end up at.
Remember that right now you can buy a 3 gig half bay solid state
drive that connects straight to your ide cable, in fact the pc thinks
it's a hard drive.. But it still cost so much that 99% of us wouldnt
buy it..
Indeed, but thats current technology. NRAM looks to be able to be produced
using current lithographic and deposition techniques, but much denser. The
price should be on a par with existing RAM - they're pitching it as a
replacement to pretty much all other RAMs, volatile or otherwise.
Time will tell, but I'm sure that the end result will be bigger and faster.
We NEED more! We always do.
Ben