B
Beemer Biker
After reading a few success stories, I tried upgradeing my 2 x 2100+
A7M266-D rev (1.04) board to a pair of 2600 mobile bartons @ 1.45 volt.
Although the newest manual listed the 1.04 rev board as allowing jumpers to
set the voltage for both cpu, the board behavied exactly like the rev 1.03.
The first cpu was set to 1.45 volts, the second was near 1.85 according to
the bios power routine. It would not boot into windows for very long, even
running at a slow 800mhz and would not boot dual into windows at all.
I set the jumpers to auto select and the voltage was better, the bios listed
1.6 for both and when windows XP SP2 started, the asus probe showed 1.472
and 1.584 for cpu1 and cpu2 respectively. I assume that is close enough to
1.45 not to get damaged?
I used crystalcpuid rev (4.1.4.226) to raise the both multipliers from x6 to
x14 which give 2500+ barton. 2600+ was not stable. This was with the new
..005 beta bios that I found at the german site.
Am currently running two instances of seti and will see what the improvement
is. Hopefully the system will not hang up over night. I suspect I will
restore it back to 2100+ as it does not appear stable enough for my
purposes, especially with different core voltages for both cpu. I also had
to re-activate windows but fortunately did not have to call in on the phone.
The latest version of wcpuid show wrong information and lists the speed as
14 x 56 = 800mhz and they failed to id the chip. Crystalcpuid got it
correct. Bringing up control-panel and system show 800 but I assume that is
from the original boot and not real-time. The last release of aida32 (385)
shows 3 x 622 = 1866mhz = 2500+. they got closer then gatesware at least.
The buss is actually 266, not 622
If anyone has any suggestions please let me know. Hopefully it will still
be running tomorrow.
A7M266-D rev (1.04) board to a pair of 2600 mobile bartons @ 1.45 volt.
Although the newest manual listed the 1.04 rev board as allowing jumpers to
set the voltage for both cpu, the board behavied exactly like the rev 1.03.
The first cpu was set to 1.45 volts, the second was near 1.85 according to
the bios power routine. It would not boot into windows for very long, even
running at a slow 800mhz and would not boot dual into windows at all.
I set the jumpers to auto select and the voltage was better, the bios listed
1.6 for both and when windows XP SP2 started, the asus probe showed 1.472
and 1.584 for cpu1 and cpu2 respectively. I assume that is close enough to
1.45 not to get damaged?
I used crystalcpuid rev (4.1.4.226) to raise the both multipliers from x6 to
x14 which give 2500+ barton. 2600+ was not stable. This was with the new
..005 beta bios that I found at the german site.
Am currently running two instances of seti and will see what the improvement
is. Hopefully the system will not hang up over night. I suspect I will
restore it back to 2100+ as it does not appear stable enough for my
purposes, especially with different core voltages for both cpu. I also had
to re-activate windows but fortunately did not have to call in on the phone.
The latest version of wcpuid show wrong information and lists the speed as
14 x 56 = 800mhz and they failed to id the chip. Crystalcpuid got it
correct. Bringing up control-panel and system show 800 but I assume that is
from the original boot and not real-time. The last release of aida32 (385)
shows 3 x 622 = 1866mhz = 2500+. they got closer then gatesware at least.
The buss is actually 266, not 622
If anyone has any suggestions please let me know. Hopefully it will still
be running tomorrow.