S
Simon Harvey
Hi everyone,
This is probably a pretty stupid question but does anyone know if its
possible to use relative addressing when it comes to accessing an image of
the file system?
In particular, I am making a simple application that needs to load a
treeview with icons. The icons are stored in a folder called icons under the
application's directory. (The folder exists in the same dir as the bin
folder and the debug folder)
The only way I can get the image to work is to put in the whole address.
Is it possible to use a relative address? Like just \icons or something? Is
it a good idea to do this?
I'm just trying to think ahead to what it would take to deploy this
application. (Not that I'm going to). I would need some sort of generic
address mechanism and of course Absolute Addressing is not at all generic.
Any advice would be greatfully recevied.
Simon
This is probably a pretty stupid question but does anyone know if its
possible to use relative addressing when it comes to accessing an image of
the file system?
In particular, I am making a simple application that needs to load a
treeview with icons. The icons are stored in a folder called icons under the
application's directory. (The folder exists in the same dir as the bin
folder and the debug folder)
The only way I can get the image to work is to put in the whole address.
Is it possible to use a relative address? Like just \icons or something? Is
it a good idea to do this?
I'm just trying to think ahead to what it would take to deploy this
application. (Not that I'm going to). I would need some sort of generic
address mechanism and of course Absolute Addressing is not at all generic.
Any advice would be greatfully recevied.
Simon