A lot of discussion on replying in HTML automatically

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

I'm brand new to OL 2003 after many years in OL 2000
I see a lot of discussion in this forum asking about replying, not in the sender's plain text, but automatically in HTML.
I have the same wish to reply, automatically to all, in HTML. When I reply to the sender's format of plain text, my "wrap function" doesn't work
As I'm typing along, I realize -- #@!!$ -- that the sender was sending in plain text---

I don't remember this problem in OL 2000. But I guess there's no solution to this in 2003. I have to manually set my reply to HTML in order for my text to wrap ???!
Thanks in advance for confirming or suggesting another way.
 
Brad said:
I'm brand new to OL 2003 after many years in OL 2000.
I see a lot of discussion in this forum asking about replying, not in
the sender's plain text, but automatically in HTML.
I have the same wish to reply, automatically to all, in HTML. When I
reply to the sender's format of plain text, my "wrap function"
doesn't work !
Click to expand...

I _always_ reply in plain text. I NEVER send HTML and my wrap function
always works.
 
I guess there's a smart-mouth clogging the forum. Can an MVP answer the question about wrap ? Thanks

----- Brian Tillman wrote: ----

Brad said:
I'm brand new to OL 2003 after many years in OL 2000
I see a lot of discussion in this forum asking about replying, not i
the sender's plain text, but automatically in HTML
I have the same wish to reply, automatically to all, in HTML. When
reply to the sender's format of plain text, my "wrap function
doesn't work
Click to expand...

I _always_ reply in plain text. I NEVER send HTML and my wrap functio
always works
 
Brad said:
I guess there's a smart-mouth clogging the forum. Can an MVP answer
the question about wrap ?
Click to expand...

I wasn't being a "smart-mouth", as you say. I was merely pointing out that
the problem you describe is apparently not endemic as you seem to believe,
since others (myself included) don't have the problem. It's not an Outlook
2003 problem, even though it may be a problem _for you_.
 
Back
Top