D
DDC
A thing to check is the pixel fillrate. The 9800pro has 3.04GP/s andI've had a Radeon 9800 pro (128mb) for the past two years which up until now
has served me pretty well. However, after downloading and trying some of
the newer gam demos such as Quake 4 and Timeshift it is apparent my current
card is struggling to keep up. Obvious it probably time for an upgrade but
I'm confused about the latest offerings from ATI that have come out since
the 9800 pro. Since my MB supports AGP 8X, PCI-E is out of the question.
Compusa is advertising a VisionTek x1300 (256MB) for $119.99 after rebates.
http://www.compusa.com/products/product_info.asp?product_code=336459&pfp=BROWSE
For this price is there enough difference to warrant switching cards. ON
PAPER the x1300 seems like the superior card, but I was wondering about real
life differences.
If it is not worth the difference than what card should I be looking at that
will give me the "best bang for the buck" upgrade? I'd like to keep it under
$200.
FWIW my system: Asus p4c800-e deluxe MB, P4 3.0C processor, 1GB Corsair
Extreme pc3700 memory, monitor is a 17" Dell Trinitron CRT and OS is WinXP
sp2.
T.I.A. for your comments
the x1300 has 1.8GP/s witch is the amount of pixel that it can render
per second.
http://apps.ati.com/ATIcompare/result.asp
I've purchase a x800 card from a x700pro and the difference was
noticeable. the pixel fillrate was 3.4 Gpixels (x700pro) And the Peak
Pixel Fill Rate for the x800 from msi was : 4.7GB/s.
In 3dmark05 the difference was about 900 (IE: 3050 x700pro to 3900
x800) so it was a good choice to me. getting a x800xl would be even
better like 1800 more in 3dm05 because of the 16 pipeline vs 12
pipeline that i own in the x800 one.
If you want to spend a few extra dollar you should check like other
are telling you the x850 or the x800xl witch is a real improvement in
FPS.
You can't go wrong with that...
Have fun.