Peter if you're still following this-
I bought a 9800 Pro /128 to try-it acts exactly the same,
so it's likely NOT the video card. I also don't think
it's the monitor per se, as I can get it up to 1024x768
with the built-in VGA driver in XP.
This leaves a couple of things-some versions of the 191T
(like mine) misidentify themselves as a Samsung 530TFT
due to a EDID bug. I suspect the Cat drivers are reading
this info (1024x768) and overriding everything I'm trying to do to get
the DVI port up to 1280 x 1024.
Or, for some reason, I have a bad DVI cable, but I find
this to be unlikely, as it works up to 1024x768@60. Only thing I
can think of here is that the Samsung supplied cable is single-link,
and that a dual-link cable, although theoretically NOT necessary
(191T bandwidth 135 Mhz per spec sheet), it may make a
difference.
If you don't mind, I have a few registry entries I'd like to compare
with you. If interested, we can take this off the NG - email me
at
vancegrn@no_spam.covad.net
(remove the obvious)
or, if you think others may benefit, we can leave it here.
Thanks.