G
Guest
--
Signed ME!!!
Signed ME!!!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
D
Dustin Harper
What processor do you have? If you have a Athlon 64 or an Intel 64 bit CPU,
you'd get better performance with the 64-Bit version. The weak side to that,
is even less driver support than what is available right now, which is
limited quite a bit. It is improving every day, though.
Otherwise, use the 32 bit. You can use the 32 bit version on the 64 bit
CPU's as well.
you'd get better performance with the 64-Bit version. The weak side to that,
is even less driver support than what is available right now, which is
limited quite a bit. It is improving every day, though.
Otherwise, use the 32 bit. You can use the 32 bit version on the 64 bit
CPU's as well.
A
Andre Da Costa [Extended64]
It depends on your needs.
I would read this excellent white paper by Windows MVP Charlie Russel - Is
Windows x64 right for me?
http://download.microsoft.com/downl..._XP_Professional_x64_Edition_Right_for_Me.doc
Top things to take in consideration, all hardware device drivers must be
64-bit, so make things like your USB Based devices, printers, scanners 64
bit native to work. 16 bit applications do not work either, some
applications utilize a 16 bit installer, so make sure your application is
either full 32 bit or 64-bit.
--
--
Andre
Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
I would read this excellent white paper by Windows MVP Charlie Russel - Is
Windows x64 right for me?
http://download.microsoft.com/downl..._XP_Professional_x64_Edition_Right_for_Me.doc
Top things to take in consideration, all hardware device drivers must be
64-bit, so make things like your USB Based devices, printers, scanners 64
bit native to work. 16 bit applications do not work either, some
applications utilize a 16 bit installer, so make sure your application is
either full 32 bit or 64-bit.
--
--
Andre
Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
C
Colin Barnhorst
If you have a 64-bit capable machine and two available partitions, do both.
Otherwise, do x86.
Otherwise, do x86.
G
Guest
Because you need all 64-bit drivers and such I'd suggest just
sticking with 32 bits. The "x64" or "x86" or whatever are needed to
address more than 4 gigabytes .. and they are fairly compatable with the older
32 bit stuff (re-compile required)
I did note HUNDREDS of new IRQs under Vista,
and once IA64 comes out then it is important to switch
(IA 64 defines HUNDREDS of new registers that the various CPU-units
can DIRECTLY OPERATE ON it is an exciting spec at least if you are
into
programming systems and low-level utilities)
Also limitations on FAT or NTFS file sizes are not changed just how much
RAM is directly addressable.
That raises a good question: why will Windows put video, audio, and
networking
all on one IRQ? everything should have its own IRQ its better and faster
this
way.
sticking with 32 bits. The "x64" or "x86" or whatever are needed to
address more than 4 gigabytes .. and they are fairly compatable with the older
32 bit stuff (re-compile required)
I did note HUNDREDS of new IRQs under Vista,
and once IA64 comes out then it is important to switch
(IA 64 defines HUNDREDS of new registers that the various CPU-units
can DIRECTLY OPERATE ON it is an exciting spec at least if you are
into
programming systems and low-level utilities)
Also limitations on FAT or NTFS file sizes are not changed just how much
RAM is directly addressable.
That raises a good question: why will Windows put video, audio, and
networking
all on one IRQ? everything should have its own IRQ its better and faster
this
way.