3.5" 7,200RPM vs 2.5" 7,200RPM

  • Thread starter Thread starter cashcream55
  • Start date Start date
C

cashcream55

I'm considering using a 2.5" 7,200RPM as a primary C: drive for the OS
+ applications, would it run as fast as a 3.5" 7,2000RPM? i.e. latency
and throughput. I'm aware it's more expensive per GB but that doesn't
affect since it's only for the OS installation and not for massive
storage space. Would I be correct it that it would use less power and
generate less heat also?
 
Seagate Momentus gen 3 notebook HD draws 5 Watts max and 2.1 Watts avg, while
the 3.5" Barracuda gen 11 HDs draw 38 Watts max and 8.5 Watts avg.
HOWEVER, notebook HDs are designed for 5V power, and desktop HDs are designed
for 12V power. Make sure your MoBo has the proper interface for a 2.5" HD...
Click to expand...

For SATA hard disks, both 2.5" and 3.5" are the same. So...?

--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (Xubuntu 8.04) Linux 2.6.26
^ ^ 10:37:01 up 3 days 14:03 3 users load average: 1.07 1.03 1.01
? ? (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa/
 
So a 2.5" SATA drive will use the same power connector from my PSU as
my current 3.5"?
Click to expand...

Yes, and that's why we have this:

http://www.century.co.jp/products/s-razoku/crosu2.html
http://usb.brando.com.hk/prod_detail.php?prod_id=00469

--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (Xubuntu 8.04) Linux 2.6.26
^ ^ 18:35:01 up 3 days 22:01 3 users load average: 1.00 1.03 1.00
? ? (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa/
 
Back
Top