P
peeps
Hi
I am after some advice on which version of Windows to use.
I currently have a customer who has 1 file server and about 20 client
machines, all clients are on Windows 2000 Pro or XP pro. (or will be)
Now don't laugh, but there server is Windows 98SE. Although 98 is a little
unstable it is doing a remarkable job and only requires rebooting about 1 or
2 times per week.
I have bee ntasked with a project of getting them of getting them
'stabalised' on a limited budget which makes me realise why the choice was
made not to move to a real server OS but I think they need to get rid of the
98 OS running as the server.
Here is what they do followed by what they will need to do followed by what
would be nice but not essential.
Current usage
File storage and sharing
Application server, they run a simple OEM SQL service for Customer
Management
Required Services
Some form of authentication (AD)
Nice to have
DHCP
DNS
Web services
Some of the 'nice to have' items can be supplied by there firewall which is
a SmoothWall box so not 100% essential. The reason I say this is that I am
hoping that the server could be replaced with a standard Windows 2000 Pro
machine rather than the MS Server products which are really quite a bit over
budget. IU would have to look at finding a reasonable priced 2nd user copy
od a server product but again reluctant to do this unless it is from a good
relaible legitimate source.
Finally, a Linux solution would not be out of the question with the
exception of the SQL service. Not ideal but this could be left running on a
plain old 2000 Pro machine as I do not believe authentication to the server
is required and hence no license required.
Any help appreciated.
I am after some advice on which version of Windows to use.
I currently have a customer who has 1 file server and about 20 client
machines, all clients are on Windows 2000 Pro or XP pro. (or will be)
Now don't laugh, but there server is Windows 98SE. Although 98 is a little
unstable it is doing a remarkable job and only requires rebooting about 1 or
2 times per week.
I have bee ntasked with a project of getting them of getting them
'stabalised' on a limited budget which makes me realise why the choice was
made not to move to a real server OS but I think they need to get rid of the
98 OS running as the server.
Here is what they do followed by what they will need to do followed by what
would be nice but not essential.
Current usage
File storage and sharing
Application server, they run a simple OEM SQL service for Customer
Management
Required Services
Some form of authentication (AD)
Nice to have
DHCP
DNS
Web services
Some of the 'nice to have' items can be supplied by there firewall which is
a SmoothWall box so not 100% essential. The reason I say this is that I am
hoping that the server could be replaced with a standard Windows 2000 Pro
machine rather than the MS Server products which are really quite a bit over
budget. IU would have to look at finding a reasonable priced 2nd user copy
od a server product but again reluctant to do this unless it is from a good
relaible legitimate source.
Finally, a Linux solution would not be out of the question with the
exception of the SQL service. Not ideal but this could be left running on a
plain old 2000 Pro machine as I do not believe authentication to the server
is required and hence no license required.
Any help appreciated.