2000, NAT & port forwarding...

  • Thread starter Thread starter FB
  • Start date Start date
F

FB

I have this 2000 server with two NICs

name: INET
IP: a.b.c.4
mask:255.255.255.192
gateway: a.b.c.62

name: LAN
IP: 192.168.100.4
mask: 255.255.255.0
no gateway

I want HTTP requests to this computer to be forwarded to a web server at
192.168.100.20

I installed NAT and added to INET´s Special Ports

On this interface
Incoming port: 80
Private address: 192.168.100.20
Outgoing port: 80

It just doesn´t work... what is wrong?

I even added the registry IPEnableRouter but no change...

any other option for this?

thanks
 
Is firewall or anything blocking device configured on your machine? Can you
see the mapping happening in NAT --> Show mappings?
 
no, there´s no firewall...

when I try to access a.b.c.4 from outside then RRAS shows 1 mapping at INET
and the show mappings is:

protocol: TCP
direction: inbound
private address: 192.168.100.20
private port: 80
public address: a.b.c.4
public port: 80
remote address: x.y.z.w
remote port: 1467

should be workng... but isn´t... I´m stunned...

Janani said:
Is firewall or anything blocking device configured on your machine? Can
you see the mapping happening in NAT --> Show mappings?

--
Thanks,
Janani [MSFT]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights."

FB said:
I have this 2000 server with two NICs

name: INET
IP: a.b.c.4
mask:255.255.255.192
gateway: a.b.c.62

name: LAN
IP: 192.168.100.4
mask: 255.255.255.0
no gateway

I want HTTP requests to this computer to be forwarded to a web server at
192.168.100.20

I installed NAT and added to INET´s Special Ports

On this interface
Incoming port: 80
Private address: 192.168.100.20
Outgoing port: 80

It just doesn´t work... what is wrong?

I even added the registry IPEnableRouter but no change...

any other option for this?

thanks
 
Yes. the configuration seems to be fine. Have you made sure that the files
hosted on the web server are indeed accessible from the NAT machine itself
i.e. no issues with the web hosting.

Also, is the interface 'LAN' added as the NAT private interface?

What is the exact error you are seeing?

--
Thanks,
Janani [MSFT]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights."

FB said:
no, there´s no firewall...

when I try to access a.b.c.4 from outside then RRAS shows 1 mapping at
INET and the show mappings is:

protocol: TCP
direction: inbound
private address: 192.168.100.20
private port: 80
public address: a.b.c.4
public port: 80
remote address: x.y.z.w
remote port: 1467

should be workng... but isn´t... I´m stunned...

Janani said:
Is firewall or anything blocking device configured on your machine? Can
you see the mapping happening in NAT --> Show mappings?

--
Thanks,
Janani [MSFT]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights."

FB said:
I have this 2000 server with two NICs

name: INET
IP: a.b.c.4
mask:255.255.255.192
gateway: a.b.c.62

name: LAN
IP: 192.168.100.4
mask: 255.255.255.0
no gateway

I want HTTP requests to this computer to be forwarded to a web server at
192.168.100.20

I installed NAT and added to INET´s Special Ports

On this interface
Incoming port: 80
Private address: 192.168.100.20
Outgoing port: 80

It just doesn´t work... what is wrong?

I even added the registry IPEnableRouter but no change...

any other option for this?

thanks
 
yes, the web server is visible from the NAT computer, thru the lan...

yes, LAN is the private interface to NAT...

NAT is working, I can access the internet from any computer on my lan just
by setting 192.168.100.4 as the gateway...

I set NAT to log the maximum amount of information but can´t find any log
files...

where does it keep the log?



Janani said:
Yes. the configuration seems to be fine. Have you made sure that the files
hosted on the web server are indeed accessible from the NAT machine itself
i.e. no issues with the web hosting.

Also, is the interface 'LAN' added as the NAT private interface?

What is the exact error you are seeing?

--
Thanks,
Janani [MSFT]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights."

FB said:
no, there´s no firewall...

when I try to access a.b.c.4 from outside then RRAS shows 1 mapping at
INET and the show mappings is:

protocol: TCP
direction: inbound
private address: 192.168.100.20
private port: 80
public address: a.b.c.4
public port: 80
remote address: x.y.z.w
remote port: 1467

should be workng... but isn´t... I´m stunned...

Janani said:
Is firewall or anything blocking device configured on your machine? Can
you see the mapping happening in NAT --> Show mappings?

--
Thanks,
Janani [MSFT]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights."


I have this 2000 server with two NICs

name: INET
IP: a.b.c.4
mask:255.255.255.192
gateway: a.b.c.62

name: LAN
IP: 192.168.100.4
mask: 255.255.255.0
no gateway

I want HTTP requests to this computer to be forwarded to a web server
at 192.168.100.20

I installed NAT and added to INET´s Special Ports

On this interface
Incoming port: 80
Private address: 192.168.100.20
Outgoing port: 80

It just doesn´t work... what is wrong?

I even added the registry IPEnableRouter but no change...

any other option for this?

thanks
 
The RAS logs are generally stored in %windir%\tracing. see
http://blogs.technet.com/rrasblog/archive/2005/12/22/416421.aspx for details
to enable logging and to collect logs.

--
Thanks,
Janani [MSFT]
http://blogs.msdn.com/jananiv

RRAS team blog : http://blogs.msdn.com/rrasblog
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights."

FB said:
yes, the web server is visible from the NAT computer, thru the lan...

yes, LAN is the private interface to NAT...

NAT is working, I can access the internet from any computer on my lan just
by setting 192.168.100.4 as the gateway...

I set NAT to log the maximum amount of information but can´t find any log
files...

where does it keep the log?



Janani said:
Yes. the configuration seems to be fine. Have you made sure that the
files hosted on the web server are indeed accessible from the NAT machine
itself i.e. no issues with the web hosting.

Also, is the interface 'LAN' added as the NAT private interface?

What is the exact error you are seeing?

--
Thanks,
Janani [MSFT]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights."

FB said:
no, there´s no firewall...

when I try to access a.b.c.4 from outside then RRAS shows 1 mapping at
INET and the show mappings is:

protocol: TCP
direction: inbound
private address: 192.168.100.20
private port: 80
public address: a.b.c.4
public port: 80
remote address: x.y.z.w
remote port: 1467

should be workng... but isn´t... I´m stunned...

"Janani [MSFT]" <[email protected]> escreveu na mensagem
Is firewall or anything blocking device configured on your machine? Can
you see the mapping happening in NAT --> Show mappings?

--
Thanks,
Janani [MSFT]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights."


I have this 2000 server with two NICs

name: INET
IP: a.b.c.4
mask:255.255.255.192
gateway: a.b.c.62

name: LAN
IP: 192.168.100.4
mask: 255.255.255.0
no gateway

I want HTTP requests to this computer to be forwarded to a web server
at 192.168.100.20

I installed NAT and added to INET´s Special Ports

On this interface
Incoming port: 80
Private address: 192.168.100.20
Outgoing port: 80

It just doesn´t work... what is wrong?

I even added the registry IPEnableRouter but no change...

any other option for this?

thanks
 
Back
Top