S
Sander Verhagen
Hi,
Using sqloledb as a provider for ADO; using exactly 1 connection to a MSDE
Server.
I'm sure many of you could imagine scenarios in which I'm walking through a
recordset, processing each of the records. Also imagine that this particular
processing again involves some database activity.
This inner database activity, for the mentioned processing, might in some
circumstances be in violation with the outer activity, for the mentioned
recordset, since the recordset is still using my 1 connection.
Isn't it generally bad practice (as a proposed solution to this) to use as
many connections as I have recordsets that are opened at that time? Does the
number of these connections map to the maximum number of "concurrent users"
that MS talks about in the MSDE specs? Do you guys solve this differently?
Thanks for thinking with me!
Greetings,
Sander Verhagen
[ (e-mail address removed) ]
Using sqloledb as a provider for ADO; using exactly 1 connection to a MSDE
Server.
I'm sure many of you could imagine scenarios in which I'm walking through a
recordset, processing each of the records. Also imagine that this particular
processing again involves some database activity.
This inner database activity, for the mentioned processing, might in some
circumstances be in violation with the outer activity, for the mentioned
recordset, since the recordset is still using my 1 connection.
Isn't it generally bad practice (as a proposed solution to this) to use as
many connections as I have recordsets that are opened at that time? Does the
number of these connections map to the maximum number of "concurrent users"
that MS talks about in the MSDE specs? Do you guys solve this differently?
Thanks for thinking with me!
Greetings,
Sander Verhagen
[ (e-mail address removed) ]