Ah.... mixed views here.
Are we agreed that the Olympics is a great tradition?
Are we agreed that this is a worldwide event that has taken part since Homer's Odyssey was written and is part of our worldwide culture?
Do we not agree that all nations coming together brings about a worldwide spirit of camaraderie?
And are we not generally in agreement that all nations meeting under a friendly spirit of sportsmanship is a good thing?
And we probably agree that worldwide there are a number of (mostly) Islamic fundamentalists that would love to see all of us forcibly converted to worshipping Allah and have all our women wearing veils?
And that these same Al-Qeda social club members want to kill any westerner who doesn't necessarily agree with their beliefs?
We may also observe that a worldwide gathering of sports people would be a prime target for these evil so and so's to make their point and gain valuable column inches in the world's press.
By shedding blood. Innocent blood.
We could also consider the point that to win the right to host these games is a great worldwide honour.
Those who argue that the cost is too high are killjoys.
How much does one nuclear sub cost to build, maintain and run for one year? A sub that will probably never be used. Let's get things in perspective here.
Ok, assuming we want to host the Olympics, all siting locations, mosque building and awarding of building contracts aside, how much do we spend on our security services to make sure Freddie Makumbo from Kenya doesn't get taken out by a suicide bomber whilst running the triathalon?
Lots of money, I'm afraid.
Lots of police, lots of covert security, lots of intelligence.
The budget, people, in terms of the national agenda, is peanuts.
We spend more in MEP's hotel bills.
Oh, ok, we don't, but you get my point.
Stop looking at huge sums of money as if it were your own and consider it as part of the National Budget.
Then be proud the UK (that's us in case you forgot) is hosting a worldwide event