G
Guest
I am using Excel 2003 Small Business Edition
I think I have a problem with correct rounding of the calculated values.
I use columns A,B, and C as follows:
-- all cells of column A are filled with value 0.01
-- B1 is filled with value 0.01
-- all cells of column B beginning from the second cell are filled with
function =SUM(B1,A2), so that any cell of column B would be a sum of a cell
immediately above and a cell to the left from the current one
-- I copy column B and paste it into column C with the "values" option, so
that only the resulting values, not functions, are copied.
0.01 0.01
0.01 =SUM(B1,A2) 0.02
0.01 =SUM(B2,A3) 0.03 --> F(x) 0.03
…………
0.01 =SUM(B80,A81) 0.81 --> F(x) 0.81
0.01 =SUM(B81,A82) 0.82 --> F(x) 0.820000000000001
When working with the resulting column C I noticed that although all data on
the sheet itself look correct, beginning from line 82 down on, some values in
the function field F(x) of a focused cell of column C are displayed with
either extra 0.000000000000001 or as a n.nn9999999 approximation of a correct
value.
Is it a bug or a known "feature"?
I think I have a problem with correct rounding of the calculated values.
I use columns A,B, and C as follows:
-- all cells of column A are filled with value 0.01
-- B1 is filled with value 0.01
-- all cells of column B beginning from the second cell are filled with
function =SUM(B1,A2), so that any cell of column B would be a sum of a cell
immediately above and a cell to the left from the current one
-- I copy column B and paste it into column C with the "values" option, so
that only the resulting values, not functions, are copied.
0.01 0.01
0.01 =SUM(B1,A2) 0.02
0.01 =SUM(B2,A3) 0.03 --> F(x) 0.03
…………
0.01 =SUM(B80,A81) 0.81 --> F(x) 0.81
0.01 =SUM(B81,A82) 0.82 --> F(x) 0.820000000000001
When working with the resulting column C I noticed that although all data on
the sheet itself look correct, beginning from line 82 down on, some values in
the function field F(x) of a focused cell of column C are displayed with
either extra 0.000000000000001 or as a n.nn9999999 approximation of a correct
value.
Is it a bug or a known "feature"?